<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging for Fun and Profit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/</link>
	<description>Working to find the dream life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:39:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is the always on ubiquitous infrastructure?</title>
		<link>http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Where is the always on ubiquitous infrastructure?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>[...] can watch movies on demand. We can share dog movies. We can make a living online. But we require a consistent internet connection to do it on the road. From wireless cards and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can watch movies on demand. We can share dog movies. We can make a living online. But we require a consistent internet connection to do it on the road. From wireless cards and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>Good job Jim!  Very informative article.  Wow !!   Published twice in a month!!  Pretty impressive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Jim!  Very informative article.  Wow !!   Published twice in a month!!  Pretty impressive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhodester</title>
		<link>http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhodester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liveworkdream.com/2007/10/10/blogging-for-fun-and-profit/#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Well, THIS was timely, considering I just asked Rene (and you) to peruse my latest post and offer some tips.  Obviously you wrote this before I asked - is some kind of kismet at work here?

I&#039;ve been trying adbright lately, and although I like the look and layout of the vertical banner ads I signed up for, there is one advertiser in rotation who seems to think that pictures of lesbians making out would be widely appealing to everyone.  This is AFTER I ticked the &quot;no adult content&quot; in my preferences when I signed up.  I&#039;m close to dropping the whole thing if those ads keep showing up, but I&#039;m torn because the decent ads with wide, general appeal look so good, and they show up about five times as often as the hot lesbians.

I tried the Google referral program and didn&#039;t get paid on some things that I knew for certain were sign ups, so I dropped it.  It was just one company that didn&#039;t come through on that, so maybe I should have reported it to Google.  It was for writer.com, and I had some writer friends pursue the link through my blog and SIGN UP, including my wife, but referral payment never came through.  They all agreed that writer.com wasn&#039;t all that anyway, so I guess I&#039;m not surprised.  But I should still probably let Google know about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, THIS was timely, considering I just asked Rene (and you) to peruse my latest post and offer some tips.  Obviously you wrote this before I asked &#8211; is some kind of kismet at work here?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying adbright lately, and although I like the look and layout of the vertical banner ads I signed up for, there is one advertiser in rotation who seems to think that pictures of lesbians making out would be widely appealing to everyone.  This is AFTER I ticked the &#8220;no adult content&#8221; in my preferences when I signed up.  I&#8217;m close to dropping the whole thing if those ads keep showing up, but I&#8217;m torn because the decent ads with wide, general appeal look so good, and they show up about five times as often as the hot lesbians.</p>
<p>I tried the Google referral program and didn&#8217;t get paid on some things that I knew for certain were sign ups, so I dropped it.  It was just one company that didn&#8217;t come through on that, so maybe I should have reported it to Google.  It was for writer.com, and I had some writer friends pursue the link through my blog and SIGN UP, including my wife, but referral payment never came through.  They all agreed that writer.com wasn&#8217;t all that anyway, so I guess I&#8217;m not surprised.  But I should still probably let Google know about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

